GRDC stubble management guideline No. 1
Growing break crops and retaining stubble are two practices known to improve soil health and nutrient cycling in broadacre cropping systems.
However, when stubble loads are heavy, management issues can result that can affect profitability. This is particularly so for growers in high rainfall and irrigated regions where heavy crop residues can exacerbate pest, weed and disease risks and hinder sowing the following season.
The ‘maintaining profitable farming systems with retained stubble in Victoria and Tasmania’ project is investigating ways growers can manage break crops in retained stubble systems without compromising whole farm profitability.
Understanding that the opportunities and challenges that come with growing break crops in a retained stubble system can be region specific, the project is being undertaken as a collaborative effort involving Birchip Cropping Group (BCG), Southern Farming Systems (SFS), Irrigated Cropping Council (ICC) in the Murray Mallee and the Victorian No Till Farmers Association (VNTFA) to produce guidelines for growers in the Wimmera and Mallee, Murry Mallee irrigation region, and the high rainfall zones in south west Victoria and Tasmania.
While this project does not end until 2017, early research findings are promising.
With appropriate rotations, developments in machinery and the strategic management of specific break crops (including row spacing, harvesting, nutrition management, weed control, termination timing and crop end-use), growers and researchers are finding that stubble can be retained without any major impediment to subsequent sowing efficiency or the productivity and profitability of the paddock.
According to Western District farmer and VNTFA member Troy Missen, the availability of improved technology such as machinery with auto-steer that allows inter-row sowing into heavy residue means growers are no longer forced into burning stubble to plant their crops.
“I know we can go in and sow into pretty heavy residue due to the machinery and equipment that’s currently available,” he said.
“Through our improved practices we’ve gained a lot more control over what we’re doing and we know exactly what’s needed for every individual paddock.”
The impact of break crops on stubble retention is one of 17 key areas being examined through this project.
Disclaimer: Any recommendations, suggestions or opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily represent the policy or views of the Birchip Cropping Group (BCG), Southern Farming Systems (SFS), Irrigated Cropping Council (ICC), Victorian No-till Farmers Association (VNTFA) or the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC). No person should act on the basis of the contents of this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. BCG and GRDC and contributors to these guidelines may identify products by proprietary or trade names to help readers identify particular types of products. We do not endorse or recommend the products of any manufacturer referred to. Other products may perform as well as or better than those specifically referred to. BCG, SFS, ICC, VNTFA and GRDC will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the information in this publication.