Do faba beans have a fit under irrigation in Tasmania?

By Heather Cosgriff, SFS

Key messages:

  • PBA Samira had the highest yield under irrigation at Cressy focus site.
  • Nura and new variety PBA Zahra also showed promise.
  • Establishment rate of 30 plants/m2 resulted in highest yield.
  • Low disease pressure meant that there was no significant difference between a moderate and intensive fungicide program.

Legume break crops are extremely important in stubble retained cereal growing systems to provide a disease and weed control break for growers.

Faba beans are one of the most water-logging tolerant grain legume species (Solaiman et al. 2007), as well as being tolerant of acid sub-soils, which should make them an ideal crop choice for Tasmanian conditions.

They are also relatively frost tolerant and respond well to cool spring conditions for pod-fill (Agriculture Victoria 20132), but they have not been popular, mostly due to the inherent susceptibility to disease and availability of other more valuable crop species, such as poppies.

In 2014 poppies suffered extensively from systemic mildew, and the uncertainty surrounding the future control of that disease renewed grower interest in alternative crops.

New, more disease-resistant (common diseases Chocolate Spot and Ascochyta Blight), varieties have recently been released, making this a good time to test them in Tasmanian conditions.

It was hypothesised that these would have a better fit for the irrigated or high rainfall zone of Tasmania than older varieties and trials were set up with funding from the GRDC Stubble Initiative to explore crop management for maximising faba bean yield.

In terms of seeding rate, current management guidelines, Pulse Australia (2016), recommend growers should establish optimum plant populations for the variety, situation and sowing time. Plant populations ranging from 20 plants/m² up to 35 plants/m² are highlighted as the optimum range for Victorian conditions, and it was worth testing these rates under Tasmanian conditions.

Trial design

Location: Pisa Estate, Cressy

Sowing date: 13 May 2015

Two trials were established under irrigation at Cressy to test faba bean variety yield response to fungicide regimes and establishment rate.

Fungicide management trial

Varieties: PBA Zahra, PBA Rana, Nura established at 25 plants/m2.

Fungicide treatments:

  • Nil – no fungicide
  • Standard – fungicide at early flowering and again two-to-three weeks later. (Carbendazim 500 @ 0.5 L/ha, Chlorothalonil (Bravo) 1.3 L/ha)
  • High – fungicide at early flowering and then fortnightly until flowering complete. (Carbendazim 500 @ 0.5 L/ha, Chlorothalonil 1.3 L/ha)

Sowing rate trial

Varieties: PBA Zahra, PBA Samira

Sowing rates: 10 plants/m², 20 plants/m², 30 plants/m², 20 plants/m² nil inoculant

The high fungicide management regime was utilised on the sowing rate trial, other crop inputs for both trials are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Trial inputs for the fungicide and sowing rate trials

Date applied

Product Rate/ha Actual GS

Reason for application

Fertiliser

13/05/15

super 200 kg at sowing

target yield 5t

Herbicide

 

25/08/15

liquid zinc 3L 16 weeks

correct nutrient level

17/09/15

Clethodim 240 500mL early flower

grass weeds

Insecticide

25/06/15

Pyrinex cotyledon

protection

Results

Yields achieved were considerably higher than the target yield of 5t/ha with the exception of plots established at 10 plants/m².

The management decision that had the greatest effect on yield was seeding rate (Figure 1).

PBA Samira established at 30 plants/m² yielded 7.85 t/ha, significantly higher than any other treatment. The next highest yielding variety was Nura, with 6.65 t/ha established at 25 plants/m² in the fungicide management trial (Table 2).

These results suggest that growers should target higher seeding rates under irrigation, and we may not have found the ceiling for optimum seeding rate yet.

Figure 1. Varietal yield response to plant establishment rate. LSD (P=0.05) 1.36 t/ha.

Figure 1. Varietal yield response to plant establishment rate. LSD (P=0.05) 1.36 t/ha.

Figure 2. Varietal yield response to plant establishment rate. LSD (P=0.05) 1.36 t/ha

Figure 2. Varietal yield response to plant establishment rate. LSD (P=0.05) 1.36 t/ha.

Table 2. Fungicide regime and variety effect on yield.
Yield

Early disease
(9 Sep)

Late disease
(7 Oct)

t/ha

severity (1-10)

% infect

Variety effect
PBA Zahra 6.12

3.6

1.1a

PBA Rana 5.46

2.4

0.6b

Nura 6.66

2.3

0.8a

Fungicide effects
Nil

5.85

2.8

0.8a

Standard

6.34

2.4

0.9a

High

6.05

3.0

0.8a

LSD P=0.05

ns

ns

0.2

Disease

Disease levels in the trials were very low during the 2015 season. Table 2 displays disease levels recorded in the fungicide management trial in September and October. Only chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) was detected in the crop in early September and rated on a 1-10 scale (1 = <10% of leaf area infected, 10 = 100% infection).

Plots were again rated for disease pressure a month later, with per cent of leaf area in upper third of crop canopy recorded. At this stage disease levels had reduced (most likely due to very dry conditions and lack of humidity in the canopy). There was therefore no significant difference in disease control between fungicide treatments, but a slight variety effect was recorded with PBA Zahra and Nura being more susceptible to chocolate spot infection.

4.1.2 Harvesting Faba Bean plots

Harvesting faba bean plots at SFS Cressey site, Tasmania.

Conclusion

Faba beans showed great promise as an alternative winter crop under irrigation.

4.1.2 Root mass & plant nodulation Faba Bean 18th September

Figure 4: Faba bean root mass and plant nodulation as at September 18, 2015.

With a high yield of 7.85 t/ha, and average just below 6t/ha, they could compare favourably with cereal crops for economic benefit.

The limitation for Tasmanian growers will be the marketing of the grain. Faba beans are exported to the Middle East for human consumption, but from Tasmania this may not be an option. Development of a local market, most likely for feed, will be critical to the success of the crop.

GRDCLogoStacked_TM_CMYK

The stubble project – maintaining profitable farming systems in Victoria and Tasmania with retained stubble (project number BWD00024) is funded by the GRDC.

References

Z. Solaiman, T. D. Colmer, S. P. Loss, B. D. Thomson, K. H. M. Siddique (2007). Growth responses of cool-season grain legumes to transient waterlogging. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58(5) 406–412.

Agnote AG0083 1994 (updated 2013).

Pulse Australia (2015). Management Guideline. Faba bean production in the South and West.

Advertisements

About BCG

Birchip Cropping Group Inc. (BCG) is a not-for-profit agricultural research and extension organisation led by farmers in the Victorian Wimmera and Mallee.
This entry was posted in Break crops in retained stubble systems, Disease management, Research results and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Do faba beans have a fit under irrigation in Tasmania?

  1. Pingback: 2015 field trials | The stubble project: Victoria and Tasmania

  2. Pingback: Break crops in retained stubble systems in Tasmania | The stubble project: Victoria and Tasmania

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s